↓ Skip to main content

Sensory determinants of behavioral dynamics in Drosophila thermotaxis

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sensory determinants of behavioral dynamics in Drosophila thermotaxis
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2014
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1416212112
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Complex animal behaviors are built from dynamical relationships between sensory inputs, neuronal activity, and motor outputs in patterns with strategic value. Connecting these patterns illuminates how nervous systems compute behavior. Here, we study Drosophila larva navigation up temperature gradients toward preferred temperatures (positive thermotaxis). By tracking the movements of animals responding to fixed spatial temperature gradients or random temperature fluctuations, we calculate the sensitivity and dynamics of the conversion of thermosensory inputs into motor responses. We discover three thermosensory neurons in each dorsal organ ganglion (DOG) that are required for positive thermotaxis. Random optogenetic stimulation of the DOG thermosensory neurons evokes behavioral patterns that mimic the response to temperature variations. In vivo calcium and voltage imaging reveals that the DOG thermosensory neurons exhibit activity patterns with sensitivity and dynamics matched to the behavioral response. Temporal processing of temperature variations carried out by the DOG thermosensory neurons emerges in distinct motor responses during thermotaxis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 202 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 23%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Master 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 45 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 36%
Neuroscience 49 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 8%
Physics and Astronomy 8 4%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 46 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2015.
All research outputs
#23,296,582
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#106,793
of 118,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,613
of 409,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#808
of 965 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 965 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.