↓ Skip to main content

Nicotinamide Riboside Preserves Cardiac Function in a Mouse Model of Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
33 X users
patent
12 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nicotinamide Riboside Preserves Cardiac Function in a Mouse Model of Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Published in
Circulation, December 2017
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.116.026099
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Background -Myocardial metabolic impairment is a major feature in chronic heart failure (HF). As the major coenzyme in fuel oxidation and oxidative phosphorylation and a substrate for enzymes signaling energy stress and oxidative stress response, NAD+ is emerging as a metabolic target in a number of diseases including HF. Little is known on mechanisms regulating homeostasis of NAD+ in the failing heart. Methods -To explore possible alterations of NAD+ homeostasis in the failing heart, we quantified expression of NAD+ biosynthetic enzymes in human failing heart and in the heart of a mouse model of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) triggered by SRF transcription factor depletion in the heart (SRFHKO) or of cardiac hypertrophy triggered by transverse aorta constriction (TAC). We studied the impact of NAD+ precursor supplementation on cardiac function in both mouse models. Results -We observed a 30% loss in levels of NAD+ in the murine failing heart of both DCM and TAC mice that was accompanied by a decrease in expression of the NAMPT enzyme that recycles the nicotinamide (NAM) precursor whereas the nicotinamide riboside kinase 2 (NMRK2) that phosphorylates the nicotinamide riboside (NR) precursor is increased, to a higher level in the DCM (40 fold) than in TAC (4 fold). This shift was also observed in human failing heart biopsies compared to non-failing controls. We show that the Nmrk2 gene is an AMPK and PPARalpha responsive gene that is activated by energy stress and NAD+ depletion in isolated rat cardiomyocytes. NR efficiently rescues NAD+ synthesis in response to FK866-mediated inhibition of NAMPT and stimulates glycolysis in cardiomyocytes. Accordingly, we show that NR supplementation in food attenuates the development of HF in mice, more robustly in DCM, and partially after TAC, by stabilizing myocardial NAD+ levels in the failing heart. NR treatment also robustly increases the myocardial levels of three metabolites, nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide, methyl-NAM and N1-Methyl-4-pyridone-5-carboxamide, which can be used as validation biomarkers for the treatment. Conclusions -The data show that nicotinamide riboside, the most energy-efficient among NAD precursors, could be useful for treatment of HF notably in the context of DCM, a disease with few therapeutic options.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 222 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 18%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 82 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 1%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 88 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 210. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2026.
All research outputs
#234,253
of 34,433,373 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#714
of 28,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,028
of 492,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#17
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,433,373 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.