↓ Skip to main content

Big data, bigger dilemmas: A critical review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
22 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
585 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Big data, bigger dilemmas: A critical review
Published in
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/asi.23294
Authors
Abstract

Health research shows that knowing about health risks may not translate into behavior change. However, such research typically operationalizes health information acquisition with knowledge tests. Information scientists who investigate socially embedded information behaviors could help improve understanding of potential associations between information behavior-as opposed to knowledge-and health behavior formation, thus providing new opportunities to investigate the effects of health information. We examine the associations between information behavior and HIV testing intentions among young men who have sex with men (YMSM), a group with high rates of unrecognized HIV infection. We used the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to predict intentions to seek HIV testing in an online sample of 163 YMSM. Multiple regression and recursive path analysis were used to test two models: (a) the basic TPB model and (b) an adapted model that added the direct effects of three information behaviors (information exposure, use of information to make HIV-testing decisions, prior experience obtaining an HIV test) plus self-rated HIV knowledge. As hypothesized, our adapted model improved predictions, explaining more than twice as much variance as the original TPB model. The results suggest that information behaviors may be more important predictors of health behavior intentions than previously acknowledged.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 585 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Taiwan 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Luxembourg 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 566 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 118 20%
Student > Master 90 15%
Researcher 55 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 8%
Student > Bachelor 38 6%
Other 105 18%
Unknown 132 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 105 18%
Social Sciences 102 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 85 15%
Engineering 24 4%
Arts and Humanities 20 3%
Other 90 15%
Unknown 159 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2024.
All research outputs
#1,996,705
of 32,567,093 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
#113
of 1,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,894
of 397,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
#7
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,567,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.