↓ Skip to main content

Obstructive sleep apnoea and Alzheimer’s disease: In search of shared pathomechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Obstructive sleep apnoea and Alzheimer’s disease: In search of shared pathomechanisms
Published in
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.12.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a significant public health concern. The incidence continues to rise, and it is set to be over one million in the UK by 2025. The processes involved in the pathogenesis of AD have been shown to overlap with those found in cognitive decline in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA). Currently, the standard treatment for OSA is Continuous Positive Airway Pressure. Adherence to treatment can, however, be an issue, especially in patients with dementia. Also, not all patients respond adequately, necessitating the use of additional treatments. Based on the body of data, we here suggest that excessive and prolonged neuronal activity might contribute to genesis and acceleration of both AD and OSA in the absence of appropriately structured sleep. Further, we argue that external factors, including systemic inflammation and obesity, are likely to interfere with immunological processes of the brain, and further promote disease progression. If this hypothesis is proven in future studies, it could have far-reaching clinical translational implications, as well as implications for future treatment strategies in OSA.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Master 20 12%
Other 9 5%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 46 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 18%
Neuroscience 30 18%
Psychology 14 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 51 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,190,765
of 26,861,052 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
#2,002
of 4,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,438
of 451,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
#18
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,861,052 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.