↓ Skip to main content

In situ measurements of Saturn’s ionosphere show that it is dynamic and interacts with the rings

Overview of attention for article published in Science, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
26 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
17 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
In situ measurements of Saturn’s ionosphere show that it is dynamic and interacts with the rings
Published in
Science, December 2017
DOI 10.1126/science.aao4134
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The ionized upper layer of Saturn's atmosphere, its ionosphere, provides a closure of currents mediated by the magnetic field to other electrically charged regions (e.g., rings) and hosts ion - molecule chemistry. In 2017, the Cassini spacecraft passed inside the planet's rings, allowing in situ measurements of the ionosphere. The Radio and Plasma Wave Science (RPWS) instrument detected a cold, dense and dynamic ionosphere at Saturn that interacts with the rings. Plasma densities reached up to 1000 cm-3 and electron temperatures were below 1160 K near closest approach. The density varied between orbits by up to 2 orders of magnitude. Saturn's A- and B-rings cast a shadow on the planet that reduced ionization in the upper atmosphere, causing a North-South asymmetry.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 34%
Researcher 6 19%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 16 50%
Chemistry 3 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 241. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2021.
All research outputs
#175,745
of 28,829,220 outputs
Outputs from Science
#5,085
of 87,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,386
of 456,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#138
of 1,192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,829,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.