↓ Skip to main content

Telephone triage and midwifery: A scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in Women & Birth, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Telephone triage and midwifery: A scoping review
Published in
Women & Birth, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.12.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Midwives use telephone triage to provide advice and support to childbearing women, and to manage access to maternity services. Telephone triage practises are important in the provision of accurate, timely and appropriate health care. Despite this, there has been very little research investigating this area of midwifery practice. To explore midwives and telephone triage practises; and to discuss the relevant findings for midwives managing telephone calls from women. A five-stage process for conducting scoping reviews was employed. Searches of relevant databases as well as grey literature, and reference lists from included studies were carried out. A total of 11 publications were included. Thematic analysis was used to identify key concepts. We grouped these key concepts into four emergent themes: purpose of telephone triage, expectations of the midwife, challenges of telephone triage, and achieving quality in telephone triage. Telephone triage from a midwifery perspective is a complex multi-faceted process influenced by many internal and external factors. Midwives face many challenges when balancing the needs of the woman, the health service, and their own workloads. Primary research in this area of practice is limited. Further research to explore midwives' perceptions of their role, investigate processes and tools midwives use, evaluate training programs, and examine outcomes of women triaged is needed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 44 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 42 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,990,988
of 34,039,688 outputs
Outputs from Women & Birth
#602
of 1,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,909
of 492,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Women & Birth
#16
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,039,688 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.