↓ Skip to main content

Sonogashira Cross-Coupling and Homocoupling on a Silver Surface: Chlorobenzene and Phenylacetylene on Ag(100)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sonogashira Cross-Coupling and Homocoupling on a Silver Surface: Chlorobenzene and Phenylacetylene on Ag(100)
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, January 2015
DOI 10.1021/ja5115584
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM), temperature programmed reaction (TPR), near edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) and density functional theory (DFT) calculations were used to study the adsorption and reactions of phenylacetylene and chlorobenzene on Ag(100). In the absence of solvent molecules and additives these molecules underwent homocoupling and Sonogashira cross coupling in an unambiguously heterogeneous mode. Of particular interest are the use of silver, previously unexplored, and chlorobenzene-normally regarded as relatively inert in such reactions. Both molecules adopt an essentially flat-lying conformation for which the observed and calculated adsorption energies are in reasonable agreement. Their magnitudes indicate that in both cases adsorption is predominantly due to dispersion forces which interaction nevertheless leads to chemical activation and reaction. Both adsorbates exhibited pronounced island formation, thought to limit chemical activity under the conditions used and posited to occur at island boundaries, as was indeed observed in the case of phenylacetylene. The implications of these findings for the development of practical catalytic systems are considered.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Kenya 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 33%
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 13%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 32 50%
Physics and Astronomy 9 14%
Materials Science 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,793,491
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#54,779
of 61,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,804
of 352,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#312
of 505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.