↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying water requirements of riparian river red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia – implications for the management of environmental flows

Overview of attention for article published in Ecohydrology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantifying water requirements of riparian river red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia – implications for the management of environmental flows
Published in
Ecohydrology, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/eco.1598
Authors

Tanya M. Doody, Matthew J. Colloff, Micah Davies, Vijay Koul, Richard G. Benyon, Pamela L. Nagler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Other 5 6%
Student > Master 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 25 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 24 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 6%
Engineering 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 29 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,892,784
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from Ecohydrology
#193
of 777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,321
of 361,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecohydrology
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 777 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.