↓ Skip to main content

The effect of applied stress on the phase and group velocity of guided waves in anisotropic plates

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The effect of applied stress on the phase and group velocity of guided waves in anisotropic plates
Published in
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, December 2017
DOI 10.1121/1.5016969
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This paper presents an analytical formulation for the phase and group velocity of acoustoelastic guided waves in anisotropic plates. Uniform in-plane applied stress is considered, with both arbitrary propagation and stress directions. An expression for the energy velocity in a stressed anisotropic plate is derived, from which the group velocity is computed. Since the wavefront and group velocity directions generally differ, the deviation angle between the two is also studied. A method is proposed for verifying the consistency of the formulation, based on the correspondence between a direct and an indirect formulation. Analytical results are presented for a unidirectional fiber-reinforced graphite/epoxy composite plate. The plate is considered homogeneous for large wavelength to fiber diameter ratios. Results for the phase velocity, group velocity, and deviation angle are presented for two uniaxial applied loading cases. These are used to study the effect of stress for various propagation and stress directions. The linearity of the deviation angle with respect to stress is also demonstrated. Exact correspondence between the direct and indirect formulations is observed, which verifies consistency. The importance of accounting for shear strain in the indirect formulation is also demonstrated, which has not been noted in previous guided wave studies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 14 41%
Physics and Astronomy 4 12%
Unspecified 1 3%
Unknown 15 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#24,765,127
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
#11,354
of 14,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#337,010
of 489,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
#53
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 489,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.