↓ Skip to main content

ESX1-dependent fractalkine mediates chemotaxis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in humans

Overview of attention for article published in Tuberculosis (formerly Tubercle and Lung Disease), February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
ESX1-dependent fractalkine mediates chemotaxis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in humans
Published in
Tuberculosis (formerly Tubercle and Lung Disease), February 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.tube.2014.01.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mycobacterium tuberculosis-induced cellular aggregation is essential for granuloma formation and may assist establishment and early spread of M. tuberculosis infection. The M. tuberculosis ESX1 mutant, which has a non-functional type VII secretion system, induced significantly less production of the host macrophage-derived chemokine fractalkine (CX3CL1). Upon infection of human macrophages ESX1-dependent fractalkine production mediated selective recruitment of CD11b+ monocytic cells and increased infection of neighbouring cells consistent with early local spread of infection. Fractalkine levels were raised in vivo at tuberculous disease sites in humans and were significantly associated with increased CD11b+ monocytic cellular recruitment and extent of granulomatous disease. These findings suggest a novel fractalkine-dependent ESX1-mediated mechanism in early tuberculous disease pathogenesis in humans. Modulation of M. tuberculosis-mediated fractalkine induction may represent a potential treatment option in the future, perhaps allowing us to switch off a key mechanism required by the pathogen to spread between cells.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 27%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 7 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2015.
All research outputs
#31,265,400
of 34,447,360 outputs
Outputs from Tuberculosis (formerly Tubercle and Lung Disease)
#1,073
of 1,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#336,657
of 375,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tuberculosis (formerly Tubercle and Lung Disease)
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,447,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,251 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.