↓ Skip to main content

A requirement for Gch1 and tetrahydrobiopterin in embryonic development

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Biology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A requirement for Gch1 and tetrahydrobiopterin in embryonic development
Published in
Developmental Biology, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.12.025
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

GTP cyclohydrolase I (GTPCH) catalyses the first and rate-limiting reaction in the synthesis of the enzymatic cofactor, tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4). Loss of function mutations in the GCH1 gene lead to congenital neurological diseases such as DOPA-responsive dystonia and hyperphenylalaninemia. However, little is known about how GTPCH and BH4 affects embryonic development in utero, and in particular whether metabolic replacement or supplementation in pregnancy is sufficient to rescue genetic GTPCH deficiency in the developing embryo.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#10,748,311
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Biology
#2,333
of 6,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,167
of 409,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Biology
#11
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.