↓ Skip to main content

The kinetochore protein, CENPF, is mutated in human ciliopathy and microcephaly phenotypes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Genetics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The kinetochore protein, CENPF, is mutated in human ciliopathy and microcephaly phenotypes
Published in
Journal of Medical Genetics, January 2015
DOI 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102691
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mutations in microtubule-regulating genes are associated with disorders of neuronal migration and microcephaly. Regulation of centriole length has been shown to underlie the pathogenesis of certain ciliopathy phenotypes. Using a next-generation sequencing approach, we identified mutations in a novel centriolar disease gene in a kindred with an embryonic lethal ciliopathy phenotype and in a patient with primary microcephaly.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 103 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 26%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 14%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 23 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,034,625
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#1,284
of 2,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,474
of 352,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#20
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.