↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rationale for Specific Allergen Testing of Patients With Asthma in the Clinical Pulmonary Office Setting
Published in
CHEST, January 2015
DOI 10.1378/chest.12-0072
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects an estimated 25 million people in the United States. In 70% to 90% of cases, asthma is associated with IgE-mediated mechanisms, which have proved central to allergen-induced inflammation in preclinical and clinical models. The importance of IgE levels in patients with moderate to severe asthma has been confirmed in randomized controlled studies with a targeted IgE blocker. Advances in laboratory methods to detect and quantify allergen-specific IgE antibodies have allowed for a quick-and-easy diagnosis of allergic IgE-mediated sensitivities in the office. Pulmonologists tend to order in vitro tests to measure allergen-specific IgE rather than to perform allergen skin testing, which is seen as the purview of allergists. This article reviews the importance of allergen testing in patients with asthma-whether by skin testing or by in vitro methods-and highlights the advantages, limitations, and interpretation of results derived from each method. Additionally, this article includes suggested documentation and administrative details for physician reporting in the office setting.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 25%
Other 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2025.
All research outputs
#5,121,309
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#4,868
of 18,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,814
of 409,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#54
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.