↓ Skip to main content

Effects of stress on immune function: the good, the bad, and the beautiful

Overview of attention for article published in Immunologic Research, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 1,221)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
60 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
55 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
13 Redditors
video
15 YouTube creators
podcasts
3 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
1653 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effects of stress on immune function: the good, the bad, and the beautiful
Published in
Immunologic Research, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12026-014-8517-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,653 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1640 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 251 15%
Student > Master 218 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 196 12%
Researcher 132 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 67 4%
Other 206 12%
Unknown 583 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 180 11%
Psychology 156 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 154 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 94 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 81 5%
Other 343 21%
Unknown 645 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 578. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2026.
All research outputs
#51,614
of 34,334,425 outputs
Outputs from Immunologic Research
#4
of 1,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295
of 275,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunologic Research
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,334,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.