↓ Skip to main content

Association Between Sustained Poverty and Changes in Body Mass Index, 1990–2015

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Epidemiology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Association Between Sustained Poverty and Changes in Body Mass Index, 1990–2015
Published in
American Journal of Epidemiology, December 2017
DOI 10.1093/aje/kwx365
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We sought to determine whether sustained poverty is associated with change in body mass index (BMI) among 4,762 black and white adults of the Coronary Artery Risk Development In Young Adults study. Household income in the past year and current BMI were measured at seven visits between 1990 and 2015. Sustained poverty was the proportion of visits during which household income was below 200% of the federal poverty level (range, 0%-100%). Sustained poverty and BMI were time-updated. Mean age in 1990 was 30 years. In adjusted linear mixed effects models, every 10% increase in sustained poverty was significantly associated with faster BMI growth in white men (+0.004 kg/m2/year, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.008) and white women (+0.003 kg/m2/year, 95% CI: 0.000, 0.006), and slower BMI growth in black men (-0.008 kg/m2/year, 95% CI: -0.010, -0.005) and black women (-0.003 kg/m2/year, 95% CI: -0.006, 0.000). In other words, being always vs. never in poverty from 1990 to 2015 was predicted to result in greater BMI gain by 1.00 kg/m2 and 0.75 kg/m2 among white men and women and less BMI gain by 2.0 kg/m2 and 0.75 kg/m2 among black men and women, respectively. Sustained poverty was a predictor of changes in BMI with differential associations by race.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Psychology 1 5%
Unknown 10 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,232,993
of 34,167,806 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Epidemiology
#4,282
of 10,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,991
of 491,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Epidemiology
#23
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,167,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 491,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.