↓ Skip to main content

Transition‐Metal‐Catalyzed π‐Bond‐Assisted CH Bond Functionalization: An Emerging Trend in Organic Synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry - An Asian Journal, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transition‐Metal‐Catalyzed π‐Bond‐Assisted CH Bond Functionalization: An Emerging Trend in Organic Synthesis
Published in
Chemistry - An Asian Journal, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/asia.201403224
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Transition-metal-catalyzed CH activation is considered to be an important tool in organic synthesis and has been accepted and widely used by chemists because it is straightforward, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly. A variety of functional groups have been used to direct metal complexes and achieve regioselective CH activation. Most directing is achieved through the σ-bond coordination of functional groups to the metal catalyst, followed by ortho-selective CH bond cleavage. However, recent work has demonstrated that π-coordinating functional groups can also assist in guiding metal complexes for site-selective CH bond activation. This emerging approach significantly expands the scope of CH activation reactions in organic synthesis. Herein, recent developments in this field are summarized.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 39 76%
Engineering 2 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2015.
All research outputs
#28,633,246
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry - An Asian Journal
#4,489
of 7,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,210
of 409,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry - An Asian Journal
#57
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,441 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.