You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mortality estimation from carcass searches using the R‐package carcass — a tutorial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wildlife Biology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2981/wlb.00094 |
| Authors |
Fränzi Korner‐Nievergelt, Oliver Behr, Robert Brinkmann, Matthew A. Etterson, Manuela M. P. Huso, Dan Dalthorp, Pius Korner‐Nievergelt, Tobias Roth, Ivo Niermann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 22% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 78 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 41 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,047,742
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Biology
#192
of 590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,281
of 359,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Biology
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.