↓ Skip to main content

Clopidogrel Desensitization Protocol for the Treatment of Thienopyridine Hypersensitivity

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Pathways in Cardiology, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Clopidogrel Desensitization Protocol for the Treatment of Thienopyridine Hypersensitivity
Published in
Critical Pathways in Cardiology, March 2007
DOI 10.1097/01.hpc.0000256476.82317.77
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The antiplatelet agent clopidogrel has become a mainstay of treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes and strokes, and to reduce ischemic complications after percutaneous coronary and peripheral interventions. As the use of this agent has become more widespread, hypersensitivity reactions to clopidogrel have been increasingly recognized. This problem can be difficult to manage, especially in patients who are in need of or have recently undergone intracoronary stenting, as therapeutic alternatives are limited. Our previously published experience shows that desensitization can allow clopidogrel to be used safely in these patients. The protocol is simple, rapid, and can be conducted by a team of cardiology and allergy-immunology specialists. This article outlines the procedural details of the protocol.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Spain 1 6%
Canada 1 6%
Unknown 14 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 76%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2015.
All research outputs
#24,786,738
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Critical Pathways in Cardiology
#197
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,620
of 129,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Pathways in Cardiology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.