↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Intake of selected bioactive compounds from plant food supplements containing fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) among Finnish consumers
Published in
Food Chemistry, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liisa Uusitalo, Maija Salmenhaara, Merja Isoniemi, Alicia Garcia-Alvarez, Lluís Serra-Majem, Lourdes Ribas-Barba, Paul Finglas, Jenny Plumb, Pirkko Tuominen, Kirsti Savela, PlantLIBRA Project’s Plant Food Supplement Consumer Survey, ePlantLIBRA Database

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to estimate the intake of selected bioactive compounds from fennel-containing plant food supplements (PFS) among Finnish consumers. The estimated average intake of estragole was 0.20mg/d, of trans-anethole 1.15mg/d, of rosmarinic acid 0.09mg/d, of p-coumaric acid 0.0068mg/d, of kaempferol 0.0034mg/d, of luteolin 0.0525μg/d, of quercetin 0.0246mg/d, of matairesinol 0.0066μg/d and of lignans 0.0412μg/d. The intakes of kaempferol, quercetin, luteolin, matairesinol and lignans from PFS were low in comparison with their dietary supply. The intake of estragole was usually moderate, but a heavy consumption of PFS may lead to a high intake of estragole. The intake of trans-anethole did not exceed the acceptable daily intake, but PFS should be taken into account when assessing the total exposure. To our knowledge, this study provided the first intake estimates of trans-anethole, p-coumaric acid and rosmarinic acid in human populations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Russia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 22%
Student > Bachelor 18 20%
Librarian 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Engineering 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Chemistry 6 7%
Other 33 38%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2026.
All research outputs
#9,347,580
of 27,264,936 outputs
Outputs from Food Chemistry
#1,009
of 3,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,713
of 279,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Chemistry
#17
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,264,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.