↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary theory as a tool for predicting extinction risk

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
35 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
315 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evolutionary theory as a tool for predicting extinction risk
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2014.12.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Timely and proactive wildlife conservation requires strategies for determining which species are most at the greatest threat of extinction. Here, we suggest that evolutionary theory, particularly the concept of specialization, can be a useful tool to inform such assessments and may greatly aid in our ability to predict the vulnerabilities of species to anthropogenic impacts.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 290 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 23%
Researcher 66 21%
Student > Master 34 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 46 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 177 56%
Environmental Science 56 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Social Sciences 3 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 61 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2015.
All research outputs
#1,930,980
of 28,914,921 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#1,007
of 3,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,316
of 371,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,914,921 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.