↓ Skip to main content

Technique and role of embolization using ethylene vinyl-alcohol copolymer before carotid body tumor resection

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics and Practice, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Technique and role of embolization using ethylene vinyl-alcohol copolymer before carotid body tumor resection
Published in
Clinics and Practice, November 2014
DOI 10.4081/cp.2014.661
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A 45-year old female referred for a large carotid body tumor resection. The tumor was encasing the internal (ICA) and external carotid arteries (ECA). She underwent angiogram and embolization of the ascending pharyngeal artery and a distal branch of the ECA using ethylene vinyl-alcohol copolymer (EVOH). Two days later, surgical resection of the tumor with regional lymph node dissection was performed along with an interposition reversed vein graft anastomosis between the mid common carotid and distal ICA. Devascularization of carotid body tumor can be performed using EVOH delivered through trans-arterial and percutaneous routes. Embolization may facilitate surgical resection and decrease blood loss but does not decrease the rate of neurological complications. Embolization can be performed by the vascular surgeon before a large carotid body tumor resection with minimal migration and or stroke risk.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 67%
Chemistry 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2015.
All research outputs
#22,695,529
of 27,784,943 outputs
Outputs from Clinics and Practice
#257
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,419
of 378,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics and Practice
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,784,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.