↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Antipsychotics on Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Measured with Positron Emission Tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychopharmacology, October 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of Antipsychotics on Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Measured with Positron Emission Tomography
Published in
Neuropsychopharmacology, October 1997
DOI 10.1016/s0893-133x(97)00042-0
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) provides an in vivo method for studying brain function. We used [15O]H20 PET to assess the effect of antipsychotic medications on rCBF in 17 subjects with schizophrenia. Each subject was scanned while receiving antipsychotic medication, and after having been withdrawn from antipsychotic medication for a 3-week period. The two scans were subtracted from one another, using a within subjects design, and the areas of difference were identified using the Montreal method. Subjects treated with antipsychotic medication had significantly higher rCBF in the left basal ganglia and left fusiform gyrus compared with the "off-medication" condition. Significantly higher relative rCBF in the anterior cingulate, left dorsolateral and inferior frontal cortex, and left and right cerebellum was observed when off antipsychotic medication. Upregulation of dopamine D2 receptors may lead to a regional increase of blood flow and metabolism in the basal ganglia, which may explain recently reported anatomical enlargement in these regions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 28%
Psychology 11 22%
Neuroscience 8 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2015.
All research outputs
#6,659,945
of 31,542,270 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychopharmacology
#2,710
of 5,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,655
of 39,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychopharmacology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,542,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.