↓ Skip to main content

Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy: Biological Mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy: Biological Mechanisms
Published in
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.prrv.2014.09.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) covers both explained and unexplained deaths. Unexplained cases or SIDS are likely to have multiple neural mechanisms contributing to the final event. The evidence ranges from subtle physiological signs related to autonomic control, to findings at autopsy of altered neurotransmitter systems, including the serotonergic system, a network that has an extensive homeostatic role in cardio-respiratory and thermoregulatory control. Processes may be altered by the vulnerability of the infant due to age, poor motor ability, or a genetic predisposition. The fatal event may occur in response to an environmental stress. A single final physiological route to death seems unlikely. An understanding of the reasons for explained SUDI also reminds us that a thorough investigation is required after each death occurs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 58 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 15%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 17 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 34%
Psychology 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
#551
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,108
of 260,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.