↓ Skip to main content

Ending the Tobacco Problem

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Ending the Tobacco Problem'
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
54 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
27 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
16 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator
podcasts
3 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ending the Tobacco Problem
Published by
The National Academies Press, September 2007
DOI 10.17226/11795
ISBNs
978-0-309-10382-4, 978-0-309-10912-3, 978-0-309-10913-0
Authors

Richard J. Bonnie, Kathleen Stratton, and Robert B. Wallace, Editors, Committee on Reducing Tobacco Use: Strategies, Barriers, and Consequences, Institute of Medicine, Richard J. Bonnie, Kathleen Stratton, and Robert B. Wallace, Editors; Committee on Reducing Tobacco Use: Strategies, Barriers, and Consequences; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Institute of Medicine, Bonnie, Richard J, Stratton, Kathleen R, Wallace, Robert B., Institute of Medicine

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 125 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 18%
Student > Master 14 11%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 29 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 23%
Social Sciences 23 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Psychology 6 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 38 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 510. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2026.
All research outputs
#63,534
of 34,307,719 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#204
of 10,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62
of 118,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#1
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,307,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.