↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Exclusive Enteral Nutrition on the Microbiota of Children With Newly Diagnosed Crohn’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of Exclusive Enteral Nutrition on the Microbiota of Children With Newly Diagnosed Crohn’s Disease
Published in
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology, January 2015
DOI 10.1038/ctg.2014.21
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is commonly used to treat pediatric Crohn's disease (CD). Meta-analysis of pediatric studies that have compared the effect of EEN with other treatments have shown that EEN induces remission in up to 80-85% of patients. We aimed to gain a comprehensive understanding of the effect of EEN on the microbiota of CD patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 132 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 21%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 4 3%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 40 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 46 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2025.
All research outputs
#3,673,045
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
#167
of 935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,680
of 432,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.