↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Shortened Infusion Time of Intravenous Ibuprofen, Part 2: A Multicenter, Open-label, Surgical Surveillance Trial to Evaluate Safety
Published in
Clinical Therapeutics, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.12.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tong J. Gan, Keith Candiotti, Alparslan Turan, Asokumar Buvanendran, Beverly K. Philip, Eugene R. Viscusi, Suren Soghomonyan, Sergio D. Bergese, Intravenous Ibuprofen Surgical Surveillance Trial Investigational Sites

Abstract

The literature and clinical data support the use of intravenous (IV) infusions of ibuprofen to control pain and reduce the opioid requirements associated with surgical pain. According to current guidelines, IV ibuprofen can be administered via a slow IV infusion performed during a 30-minute period. Although recent studies indicate that more rapid infusions may yield additional benefits for patients, the safety of such an approach needs further evaluation. The main purpose of this study was to determine the safety of single and multiple doses of IV ibuprofen (800 mg) administered over 5 to 10 minutes at the induction of anesthesia and after the surgical procedure for the treatment of postoperative pain.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 26 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 26 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,792,422
of 27,412,402 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Therapeutics
#797
of 4,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,913
of 367,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Therapeutics
#7
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,412,402 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.