↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Patterns of use of long‐acting bronchodilators in patients with COPD: A nationwide follow‐up study of new users in New Zealand
Published in
Respirology, December 2017
DOI 10.1111/resp.13235
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

While several studies have found that prescribing practices do not conform to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment guidelines, none have examined longitudinal patterns of use of long-acting beta2 -agonist (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) therapy across an entire country. We undertook a nationwide follow-up study to describe treatment patterns in new users of long-acting bronchodilators. National health and pharmaceutical dispensing data were used to identify patients aged ≥45 years who initiated LABA and/or LAMA therapy for COPD between 1 February 2006 and 31 December 2013. Dispensings of LABAs, LAMAs and inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) were aggregated into episodes of use of therapeutic regimens. Kaplan-Meier curves, sunburst plots and sequence index plots were generated to summarize, respectively, the duration of the first regimen, the sequences in which unique regimens were used and the patterns of use and non-use during follow-up. The study cohort included 83 435 patients with 290 400 person-years of follow-up. The most commonly initiated regimen was a LABA with an ICS. ICS use was inconsistent with international guidelines: over- and under-treatment occurred in patients with infrequent and frequent exacerbations, respectively, and ICS monotherapy was common. The median duration of the first regimen was 46 days. Many patients used multiple regimens over time and periods of non-use were common. In this nationwide study, patterns of use of LABAs, LAMAs and ICSs were complex and often did not comply with treatment guidelines. Further work is required to address the discrepancy between guidelines and prescribing practices.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 23%
Other 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Librarian 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 6 23%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,377,964
of 24,871,898 outputs
Outputs from Respirology
#555
of 2,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,899
of 451,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respirology
#20
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,871,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.