↓ Skip to main content

Dietary Patterns and Maternal Anthropometry in HIV-Infected, Pregnant Malawian Women

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrients, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dietary Patterns and Maternal Anthropometry in HIV-Infected, Pregnant Malawian Women
Published in
Nutrients, January 2015
DOI 10.3390/nu7010584
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Diet is a modifiable factor that can contribute to the health of pregnant women. In a sample of 577 HIV-positive pregnant women who completed baseline interviews for the Breastfeeding, Antiretrovirals, and Nutrition Study in Lilongwe, Malawi, cluster analysis was used to derive dietary patterns. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify associations between the dietary patterns and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), arm muscle area (AMA), arm fat area (AFA), and hemoglobin at baseline. Three key dietary patterns were identified: animal-based, plant-based, and grain-based. Women with relatively greater wealth were more likely to consume the animal-based diet, which had the highest intake of energy, protein, and fat and was associated with higher hemoglobin levels compared to the other diets. Women with the lowest wealth were more likely to consume the grain-based diet with the lowest intake of energy, protein, fat, and iron and were more likely to have lower AFA than women on the animal-based and plant-based diets, but higher AMA compared to women on the animal-based diet. Pregnant, HIV-infected women in Malawi could benefit from nutritional support to ensure greater nutrient diversity during pregnancy, when women face increased nutrient demands to support fetal growth and development.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 24%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2015.
All research outputs
#19,076,111
of 27,661,957 outputs
Outputs from Nutrients
#17,774
of 23,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,303
of 369,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrients
#75
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,661,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.