↓ Skip to main content

Can bats sense smoke during deep torpor?

Overview of attention for article published in Physiology & Behavior, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
26 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Can bats sense smoke during deep torpor?
Published in
Physiology & Behavior, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.12.019
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

While torpor is a beneficial energy-saving strategy, it may incur costs if an animal is unable to respond appropriately to external stimuli, which is particularly true when it is necessary to escape from threats such as fire. We aimed to determine whether torpid bats, which are potentially threatened because they must fly to escape, can sense smoke and whether respiration rate (RR), heart rate (HR) and reaction time of torpid bats prior to and following smoke introduction is temperature-dependent. To test this we quantified RR and HR of captive Australian tree-roosting bats, Nyctophilus gouldi (n=5, ~10g), in steady-state torpor in response to short-term exposure to smoke from Eucalyptus spp. leaves between ambient temperatures (Ta) of 11 and 23°C. Bats at lower Ta took significantly longer (28-fold) to respond to smoke, indicated by a cessation of episodic breathing and a rapid increase in RR. Bats at lower Ta returned to torpor more swiftly following smoke exposure than bats at higher Ta. Interestingly, bats at Ta<15°C never returned to thermoconforming steady-state torpor prior to the end of the experimental day, whereas all bats at Ta≥15°C did, as indicated by apnoeic HR. This shows that although bats at low Ta took longer to respond, they appear to maintain vigilance and prevent deep torpor after the first smoke exposure, likely to enable fast escape. Our study reveals that bats can respond to smoke stimuli while in deep torpor. These results are particularly vital within the framework of fire management conducted at Ta<15°C, as most management burns are undertaken during winter when bats will likely respond more slowly to fire cues such as smoke, delaying the time to escape from the fire.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 21%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 20 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 30%
Environmental Science 14 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 229. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2026.
All research outputs
#196,934
of 30,012,060 outputs
Outputs from Physiology & Behavior
#70
of 5,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,357
of 457,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiology & Behavior
#3
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,012,060 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.