↓ Skip to main content

INFLUENCE OF ECOLOGIC FACTORS ON PREVALENCE OF MENINGEAL WORM (PARELAPHOSTRONGYLUS TENUIS) INFECTION IN SOUTH DAKOTA, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Diseases, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
INFLUENCE OF ECOLOGIC FACTORS ON PREVALENCE OF MENINGEAL WORM (PARELAPHOSTRONGYLUS TENUIS) INFECTION IN SOUTH DAKOTA, USA
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Diseases, January 2015
DOI 10.7589/2014-06-148
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher N. Jacques, Jonathan A. Jenks, Troy W. Grovenburg, Robert W. Klaver, Shelli A. Dubay

Abstract

The meningeal worm (Parelaphostrongylus tenuis) is a nematode parasite that commonly infects white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus; WTD) throughout the deciduous forest biome and deciduous-coniferous ecotone of eastern and central North America; the species is not known to occur west of the grassland biome of central North America. We used county-specific prevalence data to evaluate potential effects of landscape and climatologic factors on the spatial distribution of meningeal worm infection in South Dakota, USA. Probability of infection increased 4-fold between eastern and western South Dakota and 1.3-fold for each 1-cm increase in summer precipitation. Sixty-three percent of WTD had only a single worm in the cranium. Expansion of meningeal worm infection across western South Dakota may be inherently low due to the combined effects of arid climate and potential attributes of the Missouri River that limit regional movements by infected WTD. Use of landscape genetic analyses to identify potential relationships between landscape features and population genetic structure of infected deer and parasites may contribute to a greater understanding of regional heterogeneity in meningeal worm infection rates across South Dakota, particularly in counties adjacent to the Missouri River. Future research evaluating heterogeneity in prevalence and intensity of infection between fawn and yearling deer, and the potential role of yearling male deer as dispersal agents of meningeal worms across the Missouri River, also is warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 9%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 39 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Other 7 16%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2015.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#1,159
of 1,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,303
of 361,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#30
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.