You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Test of a Modified Habitat Suitability Model for Bighorn Sheep
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Restoration Ecology, December 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80064.x |
| Authors |
Linda C. Zeigenfuss, Francis J. Singer, Michelle A. Gudorf |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,542,740
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Restoration Ecology
#783
of 1,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,955
of 123,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Restoration Ecology
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.