You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Application of the New Keystone‐Species Concept to Prairie Dogs: How Well Does It Work?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2000.98384.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natasha B Kotliar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 21% |
| Researcher | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 32% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2013.
All research outputs
#5,452,319
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,911
of 3,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,847
of 81,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#24
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.