↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Predictors and outcomes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteremia among patients with HIV and tuberculosis co-infection enrolled in the ACTG A5221 STRIDE study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12879-014-0735-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

BackgroundTo evaluate predictors and outcomes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteremia among participants undergoing baseline mycobacterial blood culture in the ACTG A5221 STRIDE study, a randomized clinical trial comparing earlier with later ART among HIV-infected patients suspected of having tuberculosis with CD4-positive T-lymphocyte counts (CD4 counts) <250 cells/mm3. We conducted a secondary analysis comparing participants with respect to presence or absence of M. tuberculosis bacteremia.MethodsParticipants with a baseline mycobacterial blood culture were compared with respect to the presence or absence of M. tuberculosis bacteremia. Baseline predictors of M. tuberculosis bacteremia were identified and participant outcomes were compared by mycobacteremia status.ResultsOf 90 participants with baseline mycobacterial blood cultures, 29 (32.2%) were female, the median (IQR) age was 37 (31¿45) years, CD4 count was 81 (33¿131) cells/mm3, HIV-1 RNA level was 5.39 (4.96¿5.83) log10 copies/mL, and 18 (20.0%) were positive for M. tuberculosis. In multivariable analysis, lower CD4 count (OR 0.85 per 10-cell increase, p¿=¿0.012), hemoglobin ¿8.5 g/dL (OR 5.8, p¿=¿0.049), and confirmed tuberculosis (OR 17.4, p¿=¿0.001) were associated with M. tuberculosis bacteremia. There were no significant differences in survival and AIDS-free survival, occurrence of tuberculosis IRIS, or treatment interruption or discontinuation by M. tuberculosis bacteremia status. IRIS did not differ significantly between groups despite trends toward more virologic suppression and greater CD4 count increases at week 48 in the bacteremic group.ConclusionsAmong HIV-infected tuberculosis suspects, lower CD4 count, hemoglobin ¿8.5 g/dL, and the presence of microbiologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis were associated with increased adjusted odds of mycobacteremia. No evidence of an association between M. tuberculosis bacteremia and the increased risk of IRIS was detected.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00108862.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 130 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Lecturer 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 32 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 37 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2019.
All research outputs
#18,690,232
of 29,285,890 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,950
of 9,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,691
of 374,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#74
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,285,890 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.