↓ Skip to main content

Fundamental interplay between anionic/cationic redox governing the kinetics and thermodynamics of lithium-rich cathodes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents

Readers on

mendeley
426 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fundamental interplay between anionic/cationic redox governing the kinetics and thermodynamics of lithium-rich cathodes
Published in
Nature Communications, December 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-02291-9
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Reversible anionic redox has rejuvenated the search for high-capacity lithium-ion battery cathodes. Real-world success necessitates the holistic mastering of this electrochemistry's kinetics, thermodynamics, and stability. Here we prove oxygen redox reactivity in the archetypical lithium- and manganese-rich layered cathodes through bulk-sensitive synchrotron-based spectroscopies, and elucidate their complete anionic/cationic charge-compensation mechanism. Furthermore, via various electroanalytical methods, we answer how the anionic/cationic interplay governs application-wise important issues-namely sluggish kinetics, large hysteresis, and voltage fade-that afflict these promising cathodes despite widespread industrial and academic efforts. We find that cationic redox is kinetically fast and without hysteresis unlike sluggish anions, which furthermore show different oxidation vs. reduction potentials. Additionally, more time spent with fully oxidized oxygen promotes voltage fade. These fundamental insights about anionic redox are indispensable for improving lithium-rich cathodes. Moreover, our methodology provides guidelines for assessing the merits of existing and future anionic redox-based high-energy cathodes, which are being discovered rapidly.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 426 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 20%
Researcher 56 13%
Student > Master 49 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 6%
Student > Bachelor 21 5%
Other 37 9%
Unknown 149 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 88 21%
Chemistry 87 20%
Energy 30 7%
Engineering 16 4%
Chemical Engineering 12 3%
Other 23 5%
Unknown 170 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2026.
All research outputs
#3,655,116
of 34,414,017 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#41,923
of 83,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,672
of 494,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#767
of 1,390 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,414,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,390 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.