After cardiac catheterization procedures, arterial closure can be achieved by manual compression (MC), using external mechanical compression devices, or by applying vascular closure devices (VCDs) with comparable vascular access site-related complication rates. The aim of the present study was to assess vascular access site-related complications during the implementation of structured sheath removal and MC by paramedics after catheterization procedures. After an observational phase of 3 months to assess the baseline complication rate, a structured 4-level training program was implemented to train assistant personnel, in this case paramedics, in the management of sheath removal by MC. Access site-related complication rates after sheath removal were assessed prospectively and MC by paramedics compared with MC by physicians and application of VCDs. To account for imbalances in procedure- and patient-related risk factors of access-site complications, propensity score-based matching analysis was performed (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00825331). All consecutive percutaneous transfemoral arterial cardiac catheterization procedures were prospectively assessed over a period of 8 months (n = 3,503). MC was performed in 2,315 cases, of which 180 were performed by paramedics and 2,135 by physicians; VCDs were applied in 1,188 procedures. Rates of access site-related complications were significantly lower for paramedics compared with physicians (p = 0.03) and similar between paramedics and VCDs (p = 0.77). In conclusion a structured program for paramedics to be trained in sheath removal after percutaneous cardiac catheterization procedures can be readily implemented during clinical routine with low in-hospital complication rates.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2015.
All research outputs
#31,228,668
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Cardiology
#15,183
of 15,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#379,646
of 430,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Cardiology
#120
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
