↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inactivation of cancer-associated-fibroblasts (CAF) disrupts oncogenic signaling in pancreatic cancer cells and promotes its regression 
Published in
Cancer Research, February 2018
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-2320
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Resident fibroblasts that contact tumor epithelial cells (TEC) can become irreversibly activated as cancer-associated-fibroblasts (CAF) which stimulate oncogenic signaling in TEC. In this study, we evaluated the crosstalk between CAF and TEC isolated from tumors generated in a mouse model of KRAS/mutp53-induced pancreatic cancer (KPC mice). Transcriptomic profiling conducted after treatment with the anticancer compound Minnelide revealed deregulation of the TGF-β signaling pathway in CAF, resulting in an apparent reversal of their activated state to a quiescent, non-proliferative state. TEC exposed to media conditioned by drug-treated CAF exhibited a decrease in oncogenic signaling as manifested by downregulation of the transcription factor Sp1. This inhibition was rescued by treating TEC with TGF-β. Given promising early clinical studies with minnelide, our findings suggest that approaches to inactivate CAF and prevent tumor-stroma crosstalk may offer a viable strategy to treat pancreatic cancer.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 158 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 25%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 35 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#11,442,951
of 34,350,842 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#18,589
of 35,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,834
of 372,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#113
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,350,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.