↓ Skip to main content

Evidence that dry eye is a comorbid pain condition in a U.S. veteran population

Overview of attention for article published in PAIN Reports, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 830)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evidence that dry eye is a comorbid pain condition in a U.S. veteran population
Published in
PAIN Reports, November 2017
DOI 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000629
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that dry eye (DE) may be comorbid with other chronic pain conditions. To evaluate DE as a comorbid condition in the U.S. veteran population. Retrospective review of veterans seen in the Veterans Administration Healthcare System (Veteran Affairs) between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014. Dry eye and nonocular pain disorders were ascertained by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes. Dry eye was further separated into ICD-9 codes representing tear film dysfunction or ocular pain. χ2 and logistic regression analyses were used to examine frequency and risk of DE, ocular pain, and tear film dysfunction by pain disorders. Of 3,265,894 veterans, 959,881 had a DE diagnosis (29.4%). Dry eye frequency increased with the number of pain conditions reported (P < 0.0005). Ocular pain was most strongly associated with headache (odds ratio [OR] 2.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.95-3.01), tension headache (OR 2.64; 95% CI 2.58-2.71), migraine (OR 2.58; 95% CI 2.54-2.61), temporomandibular joint dysfunction (OR 2.39; 95% CI 2.34-2.44), pelvic pain (OR 2.30; 95% CI 2.24-2.37), central pain syndrome (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.94-2.60), and fibromyalgia/muscle pain (OR 2.23; 95% CI 2.20-2.26), all P < 0.0005. Tear film dysfunction was most closely associated with osteoarthritis (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.96-1.98) and postherpetic neuralgia (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.90-2.00), both P < 0.0005. Dry eye, including both ocular pain and tear film dysfunction, is comorbid with pain conditions in this nationwide population, implying common mechanisms.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 16 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2021.
All research outputs
#785,142
of 34,327,810 outputs
Outputs from PAIN Reports
#41
of 830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,442
of 374,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PAIN Reports
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,327,810 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.