↓ Skip to main content

The development of cortical circuits for motion discrimination

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The development of cortical circuits for motion discrimination
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, January 2015
DOI 10.1038/nn.3921
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Stimulus discrimination depends on the selectivity and variability of neural responses, as well as the size and correlation structure of the responsive population. For direction discrimination in visual cortex, only the selectivity of neurons has been well characterized across development. Here we show in ferrets that at eye opening, the cortical response to visual stimulation exhibits several immaturities, including a high density of active neurons that display prominent wave-like activity, a high degree of variability and strong noise correlations. Over the next three weeks, the population response becomes increasingly sparse, wave-like activity disappears, and variability and noise correlations are markedly reduced. Similar changes were observed in identified neuronal populations imaged repeatedly over days. Furthermore, experience with a moving stimulus was capable of driving a reduction in noise correlations over a matter of hours. These changes in variability and correlation contribute significantly to a marked improvement in direction discriminability over development.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 211 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 33%
Researcher 56 25%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 17 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 77 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 33%
Physics and Astronomy 16 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Psychology 11 5%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 16 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2025.
All research outputs
#744,858
of 28,832,041 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#1,317
of 5,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,642
of 372,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#22
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,832,041 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.