↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Combination Therapy in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Role of Combination Therapy in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, February 2018
DOI 10.1097/mpg.0000000000001850
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The treatment goal for children suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been evolving with biologic therapies like anti-TNF agents assuming a more central role in treatment of more aggressive and extensive phenotype. Earlier introduction of anti-TNF agents have shown to be more effective and may even alter the natural history of IBD. However, development of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) limits long term usage and leads to dose adjustment in almost half of patients treated with these medications. One of the strategies to minimize the development of ADA has been concomitant use of immunomodulator (IM) medications, resulting in fewer infusion reactions and sustained trough levels, potentially lowering the need for dose adjustments. However, balanced with these benefits of optimized dosing and likely more sustained response, is the concern about increased risk of complications, such as infections and malignancies. The current manuscript reviews the available pediatric literature regarding efficacy, safety and side effect profile of combination (IM and biologics) therapy in pediatric Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, with particular emphasis on cost constraints, and recommendations for selection of patients who would benefit most from combination therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 32 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Unknown 34 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#9,619,644
of 34,451,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#2,792
of 7,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,755
of 492,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#35
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,451,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.