↓ Skip to main content

‘It is what it is’: mothers' experiences of providing bladder and bowel care to their daughters living with life-limiting conditions

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Palliative Nursing, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
‘It is what it is’: mothers' experiences of providing bladder and bowel care to their daughters living with life-limiting conditions
Published in
International Journal of Palliative Nursing, December 2017
DOI 10.12968/ijpn.2017.23.12.588
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Informal carers (carers) support palliative patients to live at home. Most palliative patients require bladder and bowel care (B&BC) at some point, but there is limited evidence about carers providing B&BC and how best to support them. To explore carers' experiences of providing B&BC to life-limited young adults. Interpretative phenomenological analysis of five interviews with purposively selected carers. One overarching theme, 'It is what it is', and three superordinate themes ('Whatever my daughter needs', 'Mum knows best', and 'Coping with caring') emerged. While B&BC could be challenging at times, it was not a major concern. Instead it engendered closeness and opportunities for carers to provide better care than they felt professionals could. This study informs how professionals should understand the support carers offer. Professionals should ensure that carer/patient dyads who wish to manage B&BC are supported to do so, and that their support needs are regularly assessed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 25 64%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 23%
Psychology 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 25 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,383,617
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Palliative Nursing
#132
of 629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,958
of 446,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Palliative Nursing
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 629 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.