↓ Skip to main content

The unexpected role of polyubiquitin chains in the formation of fibrillar aggregates

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The unexpected role of polyubiquitin chains in the formation of fibrillar aggregates
Published in
Nature Communications, January 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms7116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daichi Morimoto, Erik Walinda, Harumi Fukada, Yu-Shin Sou, Shun Kageyama, Masaru Hoshino, Takashi Fujii, Hikaru Tsuchiya, Yasushi Saeki, Kyohei Arita, Mariko Ariyoshi, Hidehito Tochio, Kazuhiro Iwai, Keiichi Namba, Masaaki Komatsu, Keiji Tanaka, Masahiro Shirakawa

Abstract

Ubiquitin is known to be one of the most soluble and stably folded intracellular proteins, but it is often found in inclusion bodies associated with various diseases including neurodegenerative disorders and cancer. To gain insight into this contradictory behaviour, we have examined the physicochemical properties of ubiquitin and its polymeric chains that lead to aggregate formation. We find that the folding stability of ubiquitin chains unexpectedly decreases with increasing chain length, resulting in the formation of amyloid-like fibrils. Furthermore, when expressed in cells, polyubiquitin chains covalently linked to EGFP also form aggregates depending on chain length. Notably, these aggregates are selectively degraded by autophagy. We propose a novel model in which the physical and chemical instability of polyubiquitin chains drives the formation of fibrils, which then serve as an initiation signal for autophagy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 135 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 27%
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 28%
Chemistry 17 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 23 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2016.
All research outputs
#4,261,963
of 24,037,100 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#33,058
of 50,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,772
of 359,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#399
of 685 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,037,100 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 685 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.