↓ Skip to main content

Sinus node dysfunction masquerading as complete atrioventricular block in the setting of atrial parasystole after heart transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Electrocardiology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sinus node dysfunction masquerading as complete atrioventricular block in the setting of atrial parasystole after heart transplantation
Published in
Journal of Electrocardiology, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.12.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Heart transplantation is the gold standard for treatment of end stage heart failure. Atrial parasystole (AP), defined as the presence of an additional dissociated atrial pacemaker on a surface electrocardiogram, has been described to be seen after heart transplantation using biatrial surgical technique. AP may pose a challenge in diagnosing underlying rhythm disturbances in these patients. Here, we report a rare phenomenon of junctional escape rhythm with sinus node dysfunction, mimicking as complete atrioventricular block due to the presence of an AP, in a heart transplant recipient.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Decision Sciences 1 5%
Materials Science 1 5%
Unknown 9 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2021.
All research outputs
#18,715,203
of 28,925,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Electrocardiology
#1,396
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,630
of 457,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Electrocardiology
#19
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,925,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.