↓ Skip to main content

The Biomechanics of Lumbar Disc Herniation and the Effect of Overload and Instability

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Spinal Disorders, January 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Biomechanics of Lumbar Disc Herniation and the Effect of Overload and Instability
Published in
Journal of Spinal Disorders, January 1988
DOI 10.1097/00002517-198801000-00004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A multipart study has been performed to provide a mechanical explanation for the epidemiologic association between sitting in static (e.g., factory or office) or vibration (e.g., car or truck driving) environments and acute herniated lumbar discs. It was shown that a 1 h exposure to sitting environments caused significant changes in the mechanical properties of the lumbar intervertebral disc. During many of the latter tests, specimens were unstable (exhibited by a sudden, large flexion and/or lateral bend rotation response to an axially applied load). This showed that a motion segment in the lumbar spine could suddenly buckle and apply a tensile impact loading to the posterolateral region of the disc. We also demonstrated that a combined lateral bend, flexion, and axial rotation vibration loading could cause tracking tears proceeding from the nucleus through the posterolateral region of the anulus. It suggests that a mechanism for disc herniation is mechanical changes leading to instability of the motion segment. These experiments complete the argument that lumbar disc herniations can be a direct mechanical consequence of prolonged sitting in static or vibration environments.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 27 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 23%
Engineering 19 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Sports and Recreations 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 35 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2015.
All research outputs
#9,226,861
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Spinal Disorders
#14
of 42 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,369
of 52,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Spinal Disorders
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one scored the same or higher as 28 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them