↓ Skip to main content

A Review of Dietary Intake Studies in Maintenance Dialysis Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of renal nutrition (Print), January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Review of Dietary Intake Studies in Maintenance Dialysis Patients
Published in
Journal of renal nutrition (Print), January 2015
DOI 10.1053/j.jrn.2014.11.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Protein-energy wasting affects many maintenance dialysis patients (MDPs) and decreases survival. Suboptimal dietary energy intake (DEI) and dietary protein intake (DPI), secondary to reduced dietary intake (DI), are important risk factors in the development of protein-energy wasting. Multiple investigations of DEI and DPI in MDPs have occurred but few authors have synthesized these data. A comprehensive review of DI studies in MDPs was completed with the purpose of providing timely data on DI in MDPs until updated clinical practice guidelines for nutrition in nephrology care are published. A majority of DI investigations in MDPs confirm that DEI and DPI are below current nutrition guidelines. MDPs also have significantly lower DEI and DPI when compared with healthy controls. These findings inform the direction of further guidelines for nutrition in nephrology care as well as spark future research interests.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Researcher 5 5%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 50 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 19%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 50 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2015.
All research outputs
#28,639,288
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of renal nutrition (Print)
#1,091
of 1,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,604
of 410,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of renal nutrition (Print)
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.