↓ Skip to main content

Inhibition of CX3CR1 reduces cell motility and viability in pancreatic adenocarcinoma epithelial cells

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inhibition of CX3CR1 reduces cell motility and viability in pancreatic adenocarcinoma epithelial cells
Published in
Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.12.116
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Increased expression of the chemokine CX3CL1 and its sole receptor, CX3CR1 have been correlated with poor pancreatic cancer patient survival and time to recurrence, as well as with pancreatic perineural invasion. We have previously shown that metastasis of prostate and breast cancer is in part driven by CX3CL1, and have developed small molecule inhibitors against the CX3CR1 receptor that diminish metastatic burden. Here we ask if inhibition of this chemokine receptor affects the phenotype of PDAC tumor cells. Our findings demonstrate that motility, invasion, and contact-independent growth of PDAC cells all increase following CX3CL1 exposure, and that antagonism of CX3CR1 by the inhibitor JMS-17-2 reduces each of these phenotypes and correlates with a downregulation of AKT phosphorylation. These data suggest that PDAC tumor cell migration and growth, elements critical in metastatic progression, may susceptible to pharmacologic intervention.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Master 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2017.
All research outputs
#31,228,352
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications
#30,174
of 33,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#439,748
of 494,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications
#233
of 305 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 305 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.