↓ Skip to main content

Cyborg beast: a low-cost 3d-printed prosthetic hand for children with upper-limb differences

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
7 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
701 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cyborg beast: a low-cost 3d-printed prosthetic hand for children with upper-limb differences
Published in
BMC Research Notes, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-0971-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorge Zuniga, Dimitrios Katsavelis, Jean Peck, John Stollberg, Marc Petrykowski, Adam Carson, Cristina Fernandez

Abstract

BackgroundThere is an increasing number of children with traumatic and congenital hand amputations or reductions. Children's prosthetic needs are complex due to their small size, constant growth, and psychosocial development. Families¿ financial resources play a crucial role in the prescription of prostheses for their children, especially when private insurance and public funding are insufficient. Electric-powered (i.e., myoelectric) and body-powered (i.e., mechanical) devices have been developed to accommodate children¿s needs, but the cost of maintenance and replacement represents an obstacle for many families. Due to the complexity and high cost of these prosthetic hands, they are not accessible to children from low-income, uninsured families or to children from developing countries. Advancements in computer-aided design (CAD) programs, additive manufacturing, and image editing software offer the possibility of designing, printing, and fitting prosthetic hands devices at a distance and at very low cost. The purpose of this preliminary investigation was to describe a low-cost three-dimensional (3D)-printed prosthetic hand for children with upper-limb reductions and to propose a prosthesis fitting methodology that can be performed at a distance.ResultsNo significant mean differences were found between the anthropometric and range of motion measurements taken directly from the upper limbs of subjects versus those extracted from photographs. The Bland and Altman plots show no major bias and narrow limits of agreements for lengths and widths and small bias and wider limits of agreements for the range of motion measurements. The main finding of the survey was that our prosthetic device may have a significant potential to positively impact quality of life and daily usage, and can be incorporated in several activities at home and in school.ConclusionsThis investigation describes a low-cost 3D-printed prosthetic hand for children and proposes a distance fitting procedure. The Cyborg Beast prosthetic hand and the proposed distance-fitting procedures may represent a possible low-cost alternative for children in developing countries and those who have limited access to health care providers. Further studies should examine the functionality, validity, durability, benefits, and rejection rate of this type of low-cost 3D-printed prosthetic device.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 701 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 693 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 125 18%
Student > Master 116 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 11%
Researcher 55 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 4%
Other 76 11%
Unknown 219 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 240 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 59 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 4%
Computer Science 20 3%
Design 19 3%
Other 91 13%
Unknown 243 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,139,007
of 32,883,121 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#228
of 4,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,794
of 398,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#4
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,883,121 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.