↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic resonance imaging with hyperpolarized agents: methods and applications

Overview of attention for article published in Physics in Medicine & Biology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging with hyperpolarized agents: methods and applications
Published in
Physics in Medicine & Biology, May 2017
DOI 10.1088/1361-6560/aa6be8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In the past decade, hyperpolarized (HP) contrast agents have been under active development for MRI applications to address the twin challenges of functional and quantitative imaging. Both HP helium (<sup>3</sup>He) and xenon (<sup>129</sup>Xe) gases have reached the stage where they are under study in clinical research. HP <sup>129</sup>Xe, in particular, is poised for larger scale clinical research to investigate asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and fibrotic lung diseases. With advances in polarizer technology and unique capabilities for imaging of <sup>129</sup>Xe gas exchange into lung tissue and blood, HP <sup>129</sup>Xe MRI is attracting new attention. In parallel, HP <sup>13</sup>C and <sup>15</sup>N MRI methods have steadily advanced in a wide range of pre-clinical research applications for imaging metabolism in various cancers and cardiac disease. The HP [1-<sup>13</sup>C] pyruvate MRI technique, in particular, has undergone phase I trials in prostate cancer and is poised for investigational new drug trials at multiple institutions in cancer and cardiac applications. This review treats the methodology behind both HP gases and HP <sup>13</sup>C and <sup>15</sup>N liquid state agents. Gas and liquid phase HP agents share similar technologies for achieving non-equilibrium polarization outside the field of the MRI scanner, strategies for image data acquisition, and translational challenges in moving from pre-clinical to clinical research. To cover the wide array of methods and applications, this review is organized by numerical section into 1) a brief introduction, 2) the physical and biological properties of the most common polarized agents with a brief summary of applications and methods of polarization, 3) methods for image acquisition and reconstruction specific to improving data acquisition efficiency for HP MRI, 4) the main physical properties that enable unique measures of physiology or metabolic pathways, followed by a more detailed review of the literature describing the use of HP agents to study 5) metabolic pathways in cancer and cardiac disease and 6) lung function in both pre-clinical and clinical research studies, 7) some future directions and challenges, and 8) an overall summary.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 35 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 15%
Physics and Astronomy 11 11%
Engineering 9 9%
Chemistry 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 40 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2017.
All research outputs
#22,385,843
of 27,387,710 outputs
Outputs from Physics in Medicine & Biology
#4,859
of 6,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,290
of 337,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physics in Medicine & Biology
#42
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,387,710 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,285 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.