↓ Skip to main content

Galactose metabolic genes in yeast respond to a ratio of galactose and glucose

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
3 patents
reddit
2 Redditors
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Galactose metabolic genes in yeast respond to a ratio of galactose and glucose
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2015
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1418058112
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Natural environments are filled with multiple, often competing, signals. In contrast, biological systems are often studied in "well-controlled" environments where only a single input is varied, potentially missing important interactions between signals. Catabolite repression of galactose by glucose is one of the best-studied eukaryotic signal integration systems. In this system, it is believed that galactose metabolic (GAL) genes are induced only when glucose levels drop below a threshold. In contrast, we show that GAL gene induction occurs at a constant external galactose:glucose ratio across a wide range of sugar concentrations. We systematically perturbed the components of the canonical galactose/glucose signaling pathways and found that these components do not account for ratio sensing. Instead we provide evidence that ratio sensing occurs upstream of the canonical signaling pathway and results from the competitive binding of the two sugars to hexose transporters. We show that a mutant that behaves as the classical model expects (i.e., cannot use galactose above a glucose threshold) has a fitness disadvantage compared with wild type. A number of common biological signaling motifs can give rise to ratio sensing, typically through negative interactions between opposing signaling molecules. We therefore suspect that this previously unidentified nutrient sensing paradigm may be common and overlooked in biology.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 359 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 106 29%
Researcher 57 15%
Student > Master 48 13%
Student > Bachelor 47 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 3%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 65 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 119 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 117 32%
Engineering 16 4%
Physics and Astronomy 12 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 2%
Other 30 8%
Unknown 67 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,441,617
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#44,586
of 118,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,876
of 408,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#499
of 933 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 933 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.