↓ Skip to main content

Flexible methods for estimating genetic distances from single nucleotide polymorphisms

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Flexible methods for estimating genetic distances from single nucleotide polymorphisms
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, February 2015
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.12343
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 101 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 20%
Student > Master 18 17%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Professor 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,367,275
of 28,812,439 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#934
of 2,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,667
of 275,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#16
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,812,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.