↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors for head and neck cancer in young adults: a pooled analysis in the INHANCE consortium

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Epidemiology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Risk factors for head and neck cancer in young adults: a pooled analysis in the INHANCE consortium
Published in
International Journal of Epidemiology, January 2015
DOI 10.1093/ije/dyu255
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Increasing incidence of head and neck cancer (HNC) in young adults has been reported. We aimed to compare the role of major risk factors and family history of cancer in HNC in young adults and older patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 251 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Other 18 7%
Other 59 23%
Unknown 84 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 99 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2015.
All research outputs
#658,818
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Epidemiology
#304
of 6,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,384
of 365,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Epidemiology
#4
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.